<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Related Records Lists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/</link>
	<description>WRITTEN BY BENTO™ USERS FOR BENTO USERS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:46:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-3/#comment-1151</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-1151</guid>
		<description>Hallo DeAnna,
there isn&#039;t much to be updated. Here are the few changes that have been made since Bento 1:
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Name change: Related Record Lists are now called Related Data Fields&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Smart Collections can now also be used as Related Data Fields&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Grid View has been added: displaying pictures in Related Data...&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;... which makes most sense because of the added iPhoto integration&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Hidden Note Fields have been added to the field (drag the column titles to the left to reveal)...&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;... and these notes are stored in the RD Field, NOT in the original records&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hallo DeAnna,<br />
there isn&#8217;t much to be updated. Here are the few changes that have been made since Bento 1:</p>
<ul>
<li>Name change: Related Record Lists are now called Related Data Fields</li>
<li>Smart Collections can now also be used as Related Data Fields</li>
<li>Grid View has been added: displaying pictures in Related Data&#8230;</li>
<li>&#8230; which makes most sense because of the added iPhoto integration</li>
<li>Hidden Note Fields have been added to the field (drag the column titles to the left to reveal)&#8230;</li>
<li>&#8230; and these notes are stored in the RD Field, NOT in the original records</li>
</ul>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeAnna Brandt</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-2/#comment-1150</link>
		<dc:creator>DeAnna Brandt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 06:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-1150</guid>
		<description>Any updates to this tutorial for the new Bento3 for mac?
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any updates to this tutorial for the new Bento3 for mac?<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-2/#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re correct: Bento did rename the &lt;em&gt;Related Records List &lt;/em&gt;field to &lt;em&gt;Related Data &lt;/em&gt;field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re correct: Bento did rename the <em>Related Records List </em>field to <em>Related Data </em>field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Player Profiles</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-2/#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>Player Profiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>You should edit the page name   &lt;em&gt;Related Records Lists : BentoUsers&lt;/em&gt; to something better for your webpage you write. I loved the blog post all the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should edit the page name   <em>Related Records Lists : BentoUsers</em> to something better for your webpage you write. I loved the blog post all the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-2/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Sure, Gary.
You could, for example create a library called &quot;phone conversations&quot; and use that library as a related records field in your contacts/address book.
Then for each conversation you create a new record: the Date Created field will automatically have the time/date stamp.
The best way, of course, is to create the new record from inside (within) the related records field, while you are viewing the contact information of the person you&#039;re talking to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, Gary.<br />
You could, for example create a library called &#8220;phone conversations&#8221; and use that library as a related records field in your contacts/address book.<br />
Then for each conversation you create a new record: the Date Created field will automatically have the time/date stamp.<br />
The best way, of course, is to create the new record from inside (within) the related records field, while you are viewing the contact information of the person you&#8217;re talking to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ciampi</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-2/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ciampi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-723</guid>
		<description>If I am on the phone with someone and I want to take notes of the conversation, and link them to the contact, can I do that with a time/date stamp, and will it be a record that I can continue adding to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I am on the phone with someone and I want to take notes of the conversation, and link them to the contact, can I do that with a time/date stamp, and will it be a record that I can continue adding to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-2/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 11:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-501</guid>
		<description>Hi Mo,

no, you can&#039;t do that. Go to the Bento forum and suggest this feature to be included in a future version. Make sure tech support acknowledges your request.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mo,</p>
<p>no, you can&#8217;t do that. Go to the Bento forum and suggest this feature to be included in a future version. Make sure tech support acknowledges your request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-2/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 05:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-500</guid>
		<description>Hi

Is there a way to export a library to an excel file with its related fields from other libraries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>Is there a way to export a library to an excel file with its related fields from other libraries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-2/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

since you are so nice to me, let me give you some help too.

Try this: add one field to your new &lt;strong&gt;Donations Library&lt;/strong&gt;: a &lt;em&gt;Choice Field&lt;/em&gt;. Add all the names of the organizations to that field (the ones donations were given to). You can always edit that choice field later (adding organizations). Then you CAN add an organization to the RRL from within the &lt;strong&gt;Organizations Library&lt;/strong&gt;, just as you wanted!

Tell me if you have more questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>since you are so nice to me, let me give you some help too.</p>
<p>Try this: add one field to your new <strong>Donations Library</strong>: a <em>Choice Field</em>. Add all the names of the organizations to that field (the ones donations were given to). You can always edit that choice field later (adding organizations). Then you CAN add an organization to the RRL from within the <strong>Organizations Library</strong>, just as you wanted!</p>
<p>Tell me if you have more questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-2/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the great guidance on this site - I hope I&#039;m getting this right.

For my purposes, I&#039;ve got a Library of organizations that my employer donates to, including contact information, notes, etc.  I also need to keep track of each donation made to an organization, which was previously entered in plaintext in a &quot;notes&quot; field - horrible to work with.

What I&#039;ve done is created another library called &quot;Donations&quot; with fields for amount, check number, date, acknowledgment, etc. - and inserted this into the &quot;Organizations&quot; library as a RRL.  

Doing this, if I add a new donation to the RRL from within the &quot;Organizations&quot; library, there&#039;s no way to automatically label the organization this donation was given to in the &quot;Donations&quot; library.  

But if I drag the Organizations library ONTO the Donations Library as another RRL and on that RRL it automatically populates the name of the Organization from the other library.  It&#039;s not pretty but it seems to work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the great guidance on this site &#8211; I hope I&#8217;m getting this right.</p>
<p>For my purposes, I&#8217;ve got a Library of organizations that my employer donates to, including contact information, notes, etc.  I also need to keep track of each donation made to an organization, which was previously entered in plaintext in a &#8220;notes&#8221; field &#8211; horrible to work with.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;ve done is created another library called &#8220;Donations&#8221; with fields for amount, check number, date, acknowledgment, etc. &#8211; and inserted this into the &#8220;Organizations&#8221; library as a RRL.  </p>
<p>Doing this, if I add a new donation to the RRL from within the &#8220;Organizations&#8221; library, there&#8217;s no way to automatically label the organization this donation was given to in the &#8220;Donations&#8221; library.  </p>
<p>But if I drag the Organizations library ONTO the Donations Library as another RRL and on that RRL it automatically populates the name of the Organization from the other library.  It&#8217;s not pretty but it seems to work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-2/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Alex,
bitte sehr, jederzeit!
(I better stay with English so everyone can follow)
I have the feeling we&#039;re still not clear on this. I will explain this again in next week&#039;s official tutorial update, because it wasn&#039;t really mentioned in the original tutorial.

The advantage of a relational loop is that if you add a record to a Related Records Field in one Library, it IS added to the Related Records Field of the other linked Library automatically.
To use the example of the tutorial: if you add a whole list of tracks to the related records in the Album library, ALL those records in the Track library will automatically display the Album name and Artist  in their respective Related Records Field.

Sorry for any confusion - I hope this is totally clear now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,<br />
bitte sehr, jederzeit!<br />
(I better stay with English so everyone can follow)<br />
I have the feeling we&#8217;re still not clear on this. I will explain this again in next week&#8217;s official tutorial update, because it wasn&#8217;t really mentioned in the original tutorial.</p>
<p>The advantage of a relational loop is that if you add a record to a Related Records Field in one Library, it IS added to the Related Records Field of the other linked Library automatically.<br />
To use the example of the tutorial: if you add a whole list of tracks to the related records in the Album library, ALL those records in the Track library will automatically display the Album name and Artist  in their respective Related Records Field.</p>
<p>Sorry for any confusion &#8211; I hope this is totally clear now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Wolff</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-2/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Wolff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Thank you both for answering my questions.
Simon has clearly pointed out that there is no automatic update in a self-related library (what a pity). As this was not mentioned in the tutorial I thought it has to be as it is described in the first lesson. 
The question with the smart-collection pointed in the same direction for it would make sense i.e. for use as a PIM. 
Again thank you for your help!

Best regards

A. Wolff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you both for answering my questions.<br />
Simon has clearly pointed out that there is no automatic update in a self-related library (what a pity). As this was not mentioned in the tutorial I thought it has to be as it is described in the first lesson.<br />
The question with the smart-collection pointed in the same direction for it would make sense i.e. for use as a PIM.<br />
Again thank you for your help!</p>
<p>Best regards</p>
<p>A. Wolff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-2/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Sorry about the German, Simon. I couldn&#039;t resist after noticing Alex&#039;s origin... but as you could see I didn&#039;t give a detailed answer. I wanted to wait for you.

Thanks for noting that Bento 1 didn&#039;t allow Smart Collections - I&#039;ll add that fact to me new weekly series (going into Irish now...).
I did make one test (more to follow) and found that Bento WILL automatically remove records from a (Smart Collection-) Related Records List Field that have been removed from the Smart Collection (-source) - so technically there is SOME updating. So it&#039;s not totally static in that situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the German, Simon. I couldn&#8217;t resist after noticing Alex&#8217;s origin&#8230; but as you could see I didn&#8217;t give a detailed answer. I wanted to wait for you.</p>
<p>Thanks for noting that Bento 1 didn&#8217;t allow Smart Collections &#8211; I&#8217;ll add that fact to me new weekly series (going into Irish now&#8230;).<br />
I did make one test (more to follow) and found that Bento WILL automatically remove records from a (Smart Collection-) Related Records List Field that have been removed from the Smart Collection (-source) &#8211; so technically there is SOME updating. So it&#8217;s not totally static in that situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-2/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t speak German so I&#039;m not sure what Florian&#039;s reply is so here&#039;s my answer.

When you create a relationship in a library that references itself there is no automatic updating because you&#039;re not updating the &#039;child&#039; library. With the albums and tracks, tracks can be added to an album automatically because Bento can clearly see that the albums library is the parent and that the tracks library is the child so particular tracks belong to  a particular library. However, in a self-referencing relationship Bento doesn&#039;t know what the parent-child relationship is so you have to manually manage it. You would have the same problem if you entered tracks into the tracks library in the table view. Bento would not know what the parent album for these tracks is so they would not automatically be associated with an album.

Using a smart collection as a source for a related records list is not implemented brilliantly because, as you have discovered, there is no automatic updating. In Bento 1 it was not even possible to use a smart collection as a source for a related records list so things are improving, just not quite perfect yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t speak German so I&#8217;m not sure what Florian&#8217;s reply is so here&#8217;s my answer.</p>
<p>When you create a relationship in a library that references itself there is no automatic updating because you&#8217;re not updating the &#8216;child&#8217; library. With the albums and tracks, tracks can be added to an album automatically because Bento can clearly see that the albums library is the parent and that the tracks library is the child so particular tracks belong to  a particular library. However, in a self-referencing relationship Bento doesn&#8217;t know what the parent-child relationship is so you have to manually manage it. You would have the same problem if you entered tracks into the tracks library in the table view. Bento would not know what the parent album for these tracks is so they would not automatically be associated with an album.</p>
<p>Using a smart collection as a source for a related records list is not implemented brilliantly because, as you have discovered, there is no automatic updating. In Bento 1 it was not even possible to use a smart collection as a source for a related records list so things are improving, just not quite perfect yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/comment-page-2/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bentousers.com/20080401-related_record_lists/#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Alex,
hier bin ich wieder. You do speak German, right?
Können Sie bitte Ihre zweite Frage etwas näher ausführen? Ich habe sie so verstanden:
Sie haben eine Doppelverbindung zwischen zwei Dateien hergstellt, und eine (oder beide) Datei (en) ist (sind) eine &quot;intelligente&quot; Kollektion, stimmt das so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,<br />
hier bin ich wieder. You do speak German, right?<br />
Können Sie bitte Ihre zweite Frage etwas näher ausführen? Ich habe sie so verstanden:<br />
Sie haben eine Doppelverbindung zwischen zwei Dateien hergstellt, und eine (oder beide) Datei (en) ist (sind) eine &#8220;intelligente&#8221; Kollektion, stimmt das so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

